1973³â¿¡ â¼³µÈ ¹Î°£ ¿¬±¸±â°üÀÎ ¹Ì±¹ ¿ö½ÌÅÏD.C ¼ÒÀç <Çѹ̹®Á¦ ¿¬±¸¼Ò(Institute for Corean-American Studies)>°¡ ÃÖ±Ù ¹Ì ÀÇȸ ÀÇ¿ø ¹× º¸Á°üµéÀ» »ó´ë·Î ½Ç½ÃÇÑ ¿©·ÐÁ¶»ç¿¡ ÀÇÇϸé ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 83.3%°¡ ÇÑ¹Ì »óÈ£¹æÀ§Á¶¾à¿¡ ÀÇ°ÅÇÑ ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ Çѹݵµ ¾Èº¸ °ø¾à »óÀÇ Àǹ«´Â <ºÏ´ë¼¾çÁ¶¾à±â±¸ (NATO)>¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Àǹ«¿Í µ¿°ÝÀ¸·Î Çâ»óµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù°í ¹Ï´Â´Ù°í ´ë´äÇß´Ù.
±×¸®°í ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 55.6%´Â Çѹ̵¿¸Í Ʋ ¼Ó¿¡¼ °Å·ÐµÇ´Â ¡°ÇÙ¹«±â °øÀ¯¡±ÀÇ °³³äÀº NATO ±¹°¡µé°úÀÇ ¡°ÇÙ¹«±â °øÀ¯¡±¿Í °°Àº ¼öÁØÀ̶ó°í ´ë´äÇÑ ¹Ý¸é 33.3%¸¸ÀÌ ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀÌ°ßÀ» Ç¥½ÃÇß´Ù.
ÀÀ´äÀÚÀÇ 88.9%´Â 2017³â ´ëÇѹα¹¿¡ µµÀÔµÈ THAAD(°í°íµµ¹Ì»çÀϹæ¾îüÁ¦) Æ÷´ë¸¦ ÀÌÁ¦´Â Àü¸éÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÇÀü üÁ¦·Î Àüȯ½ÃÄÑ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇß°í 55.6%´Â ´ëÇѹα¹À» ½ÇÁúÀûÀ¸·Î ºÏÇÑ¿¡ ÁØÇÏ´Â ÇÙ º¸À¯±¹À¸·Î °£ÁÖÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù°í ´äº¯Çß´Ù. 40.0%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ´ëÇѹα¹ÀÌ ¡°µ¶ÀÚÀûÀÎ ÇÙ¹«±â °³¹ß¡± Á¤Ã¥À» äÅÃÇϴµ¥ ¹Ý´ëÇÑ ¹Ý¸é 38.3%´Â ´ëÇѹα¹ÀÌ ¡°µ¶ÀÚÀû ÇÙ¹«±â °³¹ßÀ» ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù¡±´Â ÀÔÀåÀ» ¹àÇû´Ù.
55.6%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº Çѹ̵¿¸ÍÀÇ Æ² ¼Ó¿¡¼ ¡°Àü¼ú ÇÙ¹«±â¸¦ ³²ÇÑ¿¡ Àç¹èÄ¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ÁöÁöÇÑ´Ù¡±´Â ÀÔÀåÀ» Ç¥¸íÇßÀ¸¸ç 38.9%´Â ÀÌ¿¡ ¹Ý´ëÇß´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í ¾Æ¿ï·¯, 61.1%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ÇÑ¹Ì ¾ç±¹ÀÌ ÇÙ¹«±â¸¦ Çѹݵµ ÁÖº¯À¸·Î ÀüÁø ¹èÄ¡ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ÁÖÀåÇßÀ¸¸ç 27.8%´Â ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¹Ý´ë Àǻ縦 ¹àÇû´Ù.
66.7%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ÃÖ±Ù ºÏÇÑÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ Áõ°µÇ´Â ÇÙ À§Çù¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÃ¥À¸·Î ÇÑ¹Ì ¾ç±¹ÀÌ ¼±¾ðÇÑ ¡°È®Àå¾ïÁö Àü·«¡±ÀÌ º¸´Ù º¸°µÈ ¾Èº¸ °ø¾àÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇßÀ¸¸ç ¹Ý¸é 22.2%´Â ±×·¯ÇÑ °ßÇØ¿¡ °ø°¨ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
72.2%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ ¹ÙÀ̵ç(Joe Biden) ÇàÁ¤ºÎ°¡ ÃֽŠ<±¹°¡¾Èº¸Àü·« º¸°í¼>¿¡¼ ºÏÇÑÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍÀÇ À§ÇùÀ» °Á¶ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿Ü±³Àû ³ë·ÂÀ» ¼ÒȦÇÏ°Ô ¾ð±ÞÇÑ µ¥ ´ëÇØ ºÎÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çß´Ù. 94.4%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀÌ ÀϺ»ÀÇ Å°½Ã´Ù Á¤±ÇÀÌ ÃÖ±Ù ÀϺ»ÀÇ ¹æÀ§ºñ¸¦ ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ¼ö³â ³»¿¡ Á¾·¡ÀÇ GDP 1% ¼±À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ 2% ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î Áõ°¡ÇÏ·Á´Â Àǵµ¸¦ Ç¥½ÃÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ±àÁ¤ÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡Çß´Ù.
77.%ÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀÚµéÀº ¾ÕÀ¸·Î ´ë¸¸ ÁÖº¯¿¡¼ ±º»ç Ãæµ¹ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÒ ¶§ ´ëÇѹα¹ÀÌ ´ë¸¸, ¹Ì±¹, ÀϺ» µî ¿ì¹æµé°ú ÈûÀ» ÇÕÃÄ¾ß ÇÒ °ÍÀ̶ó°í ÁÖÀåÇß´Ù.
ÀÌ ¿©·ÐÁ¶»ç´Â 2022³â 10¿ù 9ÀϺÎÅÍ 30ÀϱîÁö ¿ìÆíÀÇ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.
´ÙÀ½Àº ¿µ¹® ¿øº»ÀÌ´Ù.
A twenty-second new poll conducted by the ICAS (Institute for Corean-American Studies) continues to identify issues surrounding the Korean Peninsula (KP) from a national security standpoint of the US.
Conducted to an ICAS audience on the Hill, 83.3% of the respondents believe that the U.S. obligations under the US-SK mutual defense treaty rise to the level of Article V of NATO. 55.6% think the US-SK Alliance ought to consider the 'nuclear-sharing' idea akin to the NATO style, while 33.3% do not.
88.9% of the respondents view that it is about time to make the THAAD battery fully operational since it was first introduced to SK in 2017, and 55.6% do not think SK is a de facto nuclear power in the eyes of NK.
50.0% of the respondents do not agree to a notion that SK ought to consider adopting an "indigenous nuke development" agenda, while 38.9% agree that SK ought to do so.
55.6% of the respondents believe that the US-SK Alliance should consider ¡°reintroducing tactical nukes¡± to SK. 38.9% do not think so.
Furthermore, 61.1% of respondents believe that the US-SK Alliance should consider positioning nuke assets surrounding KP, while 27.8% disagree.
66.7% of the respondents are of the view that the Extended Deterrence Strategy recently declared by the US-SK Alliance against NK's nuclear threat assures a fortiori commitment. 22.2% do not think so.
72.2% of the respondents hold a negative assessment of the apparent fact that the current U.S. administration's National Security Strategy barely mentions NK's threat and any meaningful diplomacy.
94.4% of the respondents positively assess Japan's apparent motivation to increase its defense budget in the coming years to ~2% of its GDP from its current level of ~1%.
77.8% of the respondents agree that SK should join forces with the Allies (i.e., Japan, Taiwan, US) in case of Taiwan contingency.
The survey was conducted from October9, 2022 to October 30, 2022 via email with a moderate credibility interval. Supplemental graphic data are available on
±Û=À̵¿º¹ ºÏÇѹÎÁÖÈ Æ÷·³ ´ëÇ¥